Home / Biosimilars / Research / ASCO/ASH give recommendations for biosimilar ESAs
ASCO/ASH give recommendations for biosimilar ESAs Posted 17/05/2019

Recommendations for biosimilar erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in the management of cancer-associated anaemia have been issued by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the American Society of Hematology (ASH).
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are biological analogues of human erythropoietin used for the treatment of anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and chemotherapy treatment in cancer patients. ESA biosimilars have been available in Europe since 2007 [1], with no major concerns. In the US, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved its first epoetin alfa biosimilar Retacrit (epoetin alfa-epbx) in May 2018 [2]. In order to update their recommendations on biosimilar ESAs, ASCO and ASH carried out a search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of RCTs in patients with cancer or CKD or cohort studies in patients with cancer. As part of this update the societies addressed the clinical question: Among adult patients who receive an ESA for chemotherapy-associated anaemia, darbepoetin, epoetin beta and alfa originator, and currently available biosimilars of epoetin alfa differ with respect to safety or efficacy? The systematic review of biosimilar ESAs included two meta-analyses and one RCT in patients with CKD, and one RCT and three cohort studies in patients with cancer. The Expert Panel set up by ASCO and ASH to review the evidence concluded that it ‘considers epoetin beta and alfa, darbepoetin, and biosimilar epoetin alfa to be equivalent with respect to effectiveness and safety’. Primary outcomes of interest were mortality, frequency of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, thromboembolic risk, and progression-free survival. In the case of biosimilars, haemoglobin (HgB) response and immunogenicity were additional outcomes of interest. Despite their positive recommendation, the societies do caution that ‘the evidence is of moderate to low quality, and this is derived from studies in patients with cancer and CKD’. They therefore add that ‘users should review pertinent approvals and indications as per their local regulatory authorities. Ultimately, the choice of a particular agent will depend on cost, availability, convenience, and personal considerations or preference’.
Conflict of interest For full details of the authors’ conflict of interest, see the research paper [1].
Editor’s comment
Update on clinical practice guideline on the use of epoetin and darbepoetin in adult patients with cancer Readers interested in contributing a research or perspective paper to GaBI Journal – an independent, peer reviewed academic journal platform – please send us your submission here.
Related articles ASCO issues position statement on biosimilars in oncology
References Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing. Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2019 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.
Several of the authors of the research paper [1] reported conflicts of interest, including having received research funding from, having served in a consulting or advisory role for, and having received honoraria from pharmaceutical companies.
Readers interested to learn more about biosimilars are invited to visit www.gabi-journal.net to view the following manuscript published in GaBI Journal:
http://gabi-journal.net/update-on-clinical-practice-guideline-on-the-use-of-epoetin-and-darbepoetin-in-adult-patients-with-cancer.html
ASCO/ASH update ESA recommendations
1. Bohlius J, Bohlke, K Roberto Castelli, et al. Management of cancer-associated anemia with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: ASCO/ASH clinical practice guideline update.
2. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. FDA approves epoetin alfa biosimilar Retacrit [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2019 May 17]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/News/FDA-approves-epoetin-alfa-biosimilar-Retacrit
Comments (0)
Generics News Research General
- FDA generics approvals increasing but not for a...Generics/Research | Posted 29/11/2019
- Safety of generics in US questionedGenerics/Research | Posted 15/11/2019
- Generics transition brings economic benefits to...Generics/Research | Posted 08/11/2019
- A call for economic reassessment of drug regimensGenerics/Research | Posted 04/11/2019
Biosimilars News Research General
- Use of pegfilgrastim copy biological Mecapegfil...Biosimilars/Research | Posted 06/12/2019
- Biosimilar education for Canadian nursesBiosimilars/Research | Posted 29/11/2019
- Brazilian efficacy and safety data for biosimil...Biosimilars/Research | Posted 22/11/2019
- Biologicals and biosimilar use in Asian patient...Biosimilars/Research | Posted 15/11/2019