Home / Pharma News / Drawing score lines on pills to delay generics
Drawing score lines on pills to delay generics Posted 28/10/2011
Brand-name drugmakers have come up with numerous ways in the past to delay generics from entering the market. These can include making slight changes to the doses, introducing a paediatric form, pay-for-delay deals or even buying the company that makes the active pharmaceutical ingredient. The latest novel tactic from an originator drug company, however, is coming simply in the form of a line.
Ireland-based drugmaker Warner Chilcott is adding a line or score to its Doryx (doxycycline hyclate) tablet. This does not affect the chemical composition of the antibiotic used to treat severe acne. Rather, it makes it easier for patients to divide and take the tablets in thirds, according to the company’s citizen petition filed with FDA on 23 September 2011. If FDA accepts Warner Chilcott’s argument, generic drugmakers seeking to make generics of doxycycline hyclate may be forced by FDA to rework their own versions, causing a delay in approval. This may be the first time such a manoeuvre will have delayed generics rivals, according to The Wall Street Journal. The Doryx tablets previously had only one score, however, Warner Chilcott’s recent addition of a second score to its tablet means that generic versions must now also have the same number of scores. In its citizen petition, Warner Chilcott said that approving generics with only one score ‘would raise public health concerns’. The drugmaker argued that doctors might instruct patients to divide the Doryx tablet into thirds, but a generic version with just one score would make it difficult to get the right dose, leading ‘to patient confusion and sub-optimal dosing’. This tactic from Warner Chilcott follows the release in August 2011 of new draft guidance from FDA on scoring tablets. The FDA guideline states ‘consistent scoring ensures that the patient is able to adjust the dose, by splitting the tablet, in the same manner as the reference listed drug [brand-name drug]’. ‘This enables the patient to switch between products made by different manufacturers without encountering problems related to the dose. In addition, consistent scoring ensures that neither the generic product nor the brand-name drug has an advantage in the marketplace because one is scored and one is not.’ There is much at stake. More than 383,000 patients in the US alone take Doryx. In 2010, the drug generated US$172 million in sales, or around 6% of Warner Chilcott's total revenue for 2010, according to data from Wolters Kluwer Pharma Solutions. The citizen petition from Warner Chilcott comes amid ongoing patent litigation. On 22 September 2011, the company announced that it had been granted a preliminary injunction against generics giant Mylan by the US District Court in New Jersey, USA, preventing Mylan from launching a generic version of Doryx. Warner Chilcott alleges Mylan is guilty of infringing on its ‘161 patent’ for Doryx which expires in 2022.
Source: FDA, The Wall Street Journal, Warner Chilcott
Comments (0)
Generics News Research General
- Clopidogrel goes off-patent: last of the old-st...Generics/General | Posted 18/05/2012
- Generic atorvastatin could save NHS GBP 350 mil...Generics/News | Posted 18/05/2012
- Can generic competition succeed at reducing cos...Generics/Research | Posted 11/05/2012
- Also noted on generics: 11 May 2012Generics/General | Posted 11/05/2012
Biosimilars News Research General
- Biosimilar filgrastim provides cost savings for...Biosimilars/Research | Posted 11/05/2012
- US Supreme Court looks set to challenge Afforda...Biosimilars/General | Posted 18/05/2012
- Biosimilars approved and marketed in BelgiumBiosimilars/General | Posted 18/05/2012
- Daiichi Sankyo and Coherus BioSciences make bio...Biosimilars/News | Posted 18/05/2012




