In response to the increasing availability and use of biosimilars by the UK’s National Health Service (NHS), the country’s healthcare watchdog, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), has updated its methods for providing guidance and advice on biosimilars.
UK outlines process for developing biosimilars guidances
Home/Policies & Legislation | Posted 23/01/2015 0 Post your comment
NICE is an independent organization, set up by the UK Government in 1999. The agency decides which drugs and treatments are available on the NHS in England and Wales.
In its 6 January 2015 position statement NICE states that it will consider biosimilars in the context of a multiple technology appraisal in parallel with their reference products in the indication under consideration. Positive appraisals of biosimilars will use the name of the active drug substance, including the reference product and brand name, to inform clinical decisions.
NICE technology appraisals assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of drugs and provide recommendations to the NHS.
The decision by NICE to use the name of the active drug substance aligns with the majority of European Union Member States, which have agreed that biosimilars should have the same International Nonproprietary Name (INN) as their reference biological [1].
In other circumstances, when NICE does not make a recommendation and where the agency considers a review of the evidence for a biosimilar necessary, NICE will consider producing an ‘evidence summary new medicine’. Evidence summaries will use the brand names of the medicines because substitutability and interchangeability cannot be assumed.
NICE believes that ‘biosimilars have the potential to offer the NHS considerable cost savings, especially as they are often used to treat long-term conditions’. This statement is in agreement with the European Commission, which believes that ‘increasing uptake of biosimilars can contribute to the success of the dual objectives of improving overall public health and the sustainability of Member States’ healthcare systems’ [2].
Related article
Impact of delisting ARBs in Denmark
References
1. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. EU majority says same INNs for biosimilars [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2015 Jan 23]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/General/EU-majority-says-same-INNs-for-biosimilars
2. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. Generics and biosimilars contribute to European drug savings [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2015 Jan 23]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Reports/Generics-and-biosimilars-contribute-to-European-drug-savings
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2015 Pro PharmaCommunications International. All Rights Reserved.
Source: NICE
Guidelines
New decree for the prescription and commercialization of medicines in Argentina
FDA issues draft guidance on biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars labelling
Reports
Follow-on biological/biosimilar approvals in Latin America by therapeutic class
Follow-on biological/biosimilar approvals landscape in Latin America
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
Strategic plans of ANVISA and COFEPRIS to advance health regulation
Panama enacts new bill to guarantees the supply of medicines
EMA concept paper towards a tailored clinical approach in biosimilar development
Public consultation for the modification of the biosimilars regulation in Brazil
Comments (0)
Post your comment