German generics giant Stada Arzneimittel (Stada) and Hungary-based Gedeon Richter (Richter) announced on 30 August 2011 that the two companies have signed licence and collaboration agreements for the development and marketing of two biosimilars.
Stada and Richter to collaborate on biosimilar development
Biosimilars/News
|
Posted 02/09/2011
0
Post your comment
The agreements involve the two monoclonal antibody products rituximab and trastuzumab, which are used to treat cancer and autoimmune diseases.
Under the deal, Stada receives non-exclusive rights to sell the active ingredient rituximab, which Richter is developing, in Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States, excluding Russia.
In addition to payment of an unspecified amount on the signing of the agreement, Stada will make further payments to Richter depending on the progress of the development of rituximab to a total of ‘low double-digit million Euros’, according to the announcement from the two companies. Regulatory approval of the product is expected at the end of 2017.
Richter, in turn, will purchase from Stada the active ingredient trastuzumab, for which Stada discontinued development in 2010, for a ‘low single-digit million Euros figure’. This will enable the development of both biosimilars to be continued under the leadership of Richter.
These agreements underpin Stada’s strategy to refrain from carrying out its own cost-intensive biosimilar development and to instead rely on cooperations and licences with biotech companies willing to risk the high development costs associated with biosimilars. With costs for developing a biosimilar having been estimated at US$100 million on average, and lengthy timelines (up to eight years), it is not surprising that Stada has decided on this business strategy.
The global biosimilar market is expected to grow from US$243 million in 2010 to US$3.7 billion in 2015 according to 2011 data from Datamonitor. Add to that the fact that more than 30 branded biologicals worth US$51 billion will lose patent exclusivity by 2015 and you can see why many are clamouring to be part of this lucrative market.
Source: Richter, Stada
Research
Reaching ESG goals in pharmaceutical development
What is the future for the US biosimilar interchangeability designation
General
Samsung Bioepis wins Pyzchiva case; Regeneron patent rulings threaten foreign biosimilars
Chinese biosimilars go global: growth, partnerships, and challenges
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
FDA approves Poherdy (first interchangeable pertuzumab) and Armlupeg (pegfilgrastim) biosimilars
EMA recommends approval for insulin glargine biosimilar Ondibta and denosumab biosimilar Osqay
FDA approves denosumab biosimilars Osvyrti and Jubereq, Boncresa and Oziltus
FDA approves aflibercept biosimilar Eydenzelt and label expansion for adalimumab biosimilar Yuflyma
FDA approves Poherdy (first interchangeable pertuzumab) and Armlupeg (pegfilgrastim) biosimilars
Biosimilars/News Posted 27/01/2026
EMA recommends approval for insulin glargine biosimilar Ondibta and denosumab biosimilar Osqay
Biosimilars/News Posted 16/01/2026
FDA approves denosumab biosimilars Osvyrti and Jubereq, Boncresa and Oziltus
Biosimilars/News Posted 07/01/2026
FDA approves aflibercept biosimilar Eydenzelt and label expansion for adalimumab biosimilar Yuflyma
Biosimilars/News Posted 05/12/2025
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Post your comment