Two major US pharmacy chains, Walgreen and Kroger, have sued healthcare giant Johnson & Johnson (J&J) in the US District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The pharmacies allege that J&J prevented insurers from covering biosimilars of its blockbuster immunology drug Remicade (infliximab).
US pharmacies sue J&J for stifling infliximab biosimilars
Biosimilars/General
|
Posted 13/07/2018
0
Post your comment
According to the complaint, Remicade enjoyed monopoly status from 1998 until the entry of Pfizer’s biosimilar, Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb), in 2016 [1] and Merck’s biosimilar, Renflexis (infliximab-abda), in 2017 [2]. This monopoly, according to Walgreen and Kroger, allowed J&J to sell Remicade at extremely high prices and to generate annual US sales of about US$4.8 billion in 2016.
Walgreen and Kroger claim that J&J used exclusionary contracts, bundled discounts and coercive rebates to insurers to maintain a monopoly. This they say suppressed competition from the infliximab biosimilars and meant that they only managed to gain a minimal (‘de minimis’) share (< 5%) of the infliximab market. ‘Absent that exclusionary conduct, those products would have achieved much higher market shares and plaintiffs and other purchasers would have received the benefits of that price competition in the form of lower purchase prices’ the lawsuit claims.
J&J implemented what it described as its ‘Biosimilar Readiness Plan’ within weeks of the approval of Pfizer’s infliximab biosimilar in 2016 [3]. According to the lawsuit this was done to maintain J&J’s market share. The plan included entering into deals with health insurers under which they agreed to exclude infliximab biosimilars from coverage altogether, or to only cover them if treatment with Remicade failed.
These actions have also affected the majority of patients in the US say the two pharmacy chains. They claim that ‘J&J has induced most of the major health insurers in the US, covering at least 70% of privately insured patients in the US, to adopt these exclusionary restrictions’.
Related article
J&J drops lawsuit against Samsung Bioepis over Remicade biosimilar
References
1. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. FDA approves infliximab biosimilar Inflectra [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2018 Jul 13]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/News/FDA-approves-infliximab-biosimilar-Inflectra
2. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. FDA approves biosimilar infliximab Renflexis [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2018 Jul 13]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/News/FDA-approves-biosimilar-infliximab-Renflexis
3. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. Antitrust activities in the pharmaceutical industry [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2018 Jul 13]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Generics/Research/Antitrust-activities-in-the-pharmaceutical-industry
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2018 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.
Source: Class Action,Knowledge Ecology International
Research
HHS push to ‘genericize’ biosimilars sparks backlash
Biosimilar interchangeability: a necessary fix, but not a silver bullet
News
Canada approves multiple denosumab and ustekinumab biosimilars as global competition grows
FDA approves Zimrixby (rituximab) and Garzulys (insulin aspart) biosimilars
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
Medicines for Europe calls for Biotech Act reforms to address ‘biosimilar void’
SBR issues position statement on safe originator biological/biosimilar interchangeability
Samsung Bioepis wins Pyzchiva case; Regeneron patent rulings threaten foreign biosimilars
Chinese biosimilars go global: growth, partnerships, and challenges
Medicines for Europe calls for Biotech Act reforms to address ‘biosimilar void’
Biosimilars/General Posted 04/08/2026
SBR issues position statement on safe originator biological/biosimilar interchangeability
Biosimilars/General Posted 13/03/2026
Samsung Bioepis wins Pyzchiva case; Regeneron patent rulings threaten foreign biosimilars
Biosimilars/General Posted 30/07/2025
Chinese biosimilars go global: growth, partnerships, and challenges
Biosimilars/General Posted 30/04/2025
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Post your comment