Researchers have found biosimilar erythropoietin (EPO) products have the same or even better quality compared with the original branded products.
Biosimilar EPOs show the same or better quality
Biosimilars/Research | Posted 12/11/2010 0 Post your comment
The quality of therapeutic EPO products, including two biosimilars, was compared with respect to content, aggregation, isoform profile and potency.
Two originator products, Eprex (epoetin alfa) and Dynepo (epoetin delta), and two biosimilar products, Binocrit (epoetin alfa) and Retacrit (epoetin zeta), were compared using high performance size exclusion chromatography, ELISA, SDS-PAGE, capillary zone electrophoresis and in-vivo potency.
The results showed that the tested EPO products differed in content, isoform composition, and potency. However, of the tested products, the biosimilars had the same or even better quality compared to the originals. Especially, the potency of originals was found may significantly differ from the value on the label.
The differences between the EPO products shown by this research further highlight the difficulties with demonstrating the ‘comparability’ of biosimilar products and the fact that the manufacturing process is critical in producing biosimilars. However, in this case maybe ‘biobetter’ is indeed the correct term.
Despite the challenges, EPO biosimilars have obviously got it right, providing, not only cost savings and greater accessibility to biopharmaceuticals, but also high quality products.
Related articles
Biosimilar epoetins: how similar are they?
Reference
Brinks V, et al. Quality of original and biosimilar epoetin products. Pharm Res. Published online: 01 October 2010. Doi: 10.1007/s11095-010-0288-2
News
First denosumab biosimilars approved in Canada and the US
Dr Reddy's launches bevacizumab biosimilar Versavo in the UK
General
Brazil advances in follow-on biologicals/biosimilars approvals, trailing Europe
Insurer perspective on increasing biosimilar uptake in Canada
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
Comparing biosimilar adoption: Medicare Advantage versus traditional Medicare
Questioning the need for ethnic sensitivity assessments for biosimilar monoclonal antibodies
ANVISA's role in biosimilar medicine regulation and innovation promotion
Infliximab discontinuation in patients with originator retransition vs biosimilar continuation
Comments (0)
Post your comment