The European Court of Justice has backed an earlier decision by the UK financial regulator, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), to fine pharma giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) in connection with ‘pay for delay’ deals for one of its off-patent medications.
European Court of Justice backs UK in pay-for-delay fine against GSK
Home/Policies & Legislation
|
Posted 14/02/2020
0
Post your comment
Advocate General Kokott found on 30 January 2020 that a deal between GSK and generics makers involving its now off-patent antidepressant Seroxat/Paxil (paroxetine) ‘may be contrary to European Union (EU) competition law’.
The CMA fined GSK in February 2016 for anti-competitive conduct and agreements in relation to the supply of paroxetine [1]. GSK then took this decision to the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), but the tribunal agreed with the ruling made by the CMA in 2016 and upheld the decision that GSK’s conduct and agreements made in relation to the supply of paroxetine were anti-competitive. However, it also said that it had referred ‘all substantive points’ to the European Court of Justice [2].
To clarify its decision, the European Court of Justice stated:
1. that such agreements are only unlawful if they have ‘a negative and appreciable effect on competition within the internal market’
2. that generics companies must have a ‘real and concrete possibility’ of launching a generic drug in order for a deal to be deemed anti-competitive
3. patents do not constitute, in themselves, a barrier to market entry, since their validity can be contested
The European Court of Justice ruling concluded that such deals were not necessarily barriers to competition and that each individual case had to be considered on its own. The court therefore referred the final decision back to the UK’s CAT for a final judgment.
The UK’s CMA said that it welcomed the ruling. It added that the ruling had ‘clarified a number of important questions and will help competition authorities, including the CMA, in their work to tackle this type of harmful behaviour by pharmaceutical companies’.
Related article
Generics companies defend against illegal ‘pay-for-delay’ charges
References
1. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. UK’s competition authority fines GSK for pay-for-delay [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2020 Feb 14]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Policies-Legislation/UK-s-competition-authority-fines-GSK-for-pay-for-delay
2. GaBI Online - Generics and Biosimilars Initiative. GSK fined GBP 37.6 million in pay-for-delay appeal [www.gabionline.net]. Mol, Belgium: Pro Pharma Communications International; [cited 2020 Feb 14]. Available from: www.gabionline.net/Generics/News/GSK-fined-GBP-37.6-million-in-pay-for-delay-appeal
Permission granted to reproduce for personal and non-commercial use only. All other reproduction, copy or reprinting of all or part of any ‘Content’ found on this website is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher. Contact the publisher to obtain permission before redistributing.
Copyright – Unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are © 2020 Pro Pharma Communications International. All Rights Reserved.
Source: CMA
Guidelines
Brazil's ANVISA updates guidance on pharmacokinetic studies for biosimilars
Canada eliminates phase III trial requirement for biosimilar approvals
Reports
Central America moves toward joint evaluation of biosimilar medicines
The US$52 billion question: can the US keep biosimilars competitive?
Most viewed articles
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Global biosimilars guideline development – EGA’s perspective
Related content
ANVISA and DINAVISA sign MoU to strengthen border surveillance and regulatory cooperation
Congress pushes biosimilar bills as interchangeability concerns linger
ANVISA updates understanding on biosimilar interchangeability
China's 12th VBP round accelerates shift to generics and biosimilars dual-track
ANVISA and DINAVISA sign MoU to strengthen border surveillance and regulatory cooperation
Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 15/09/2026
Congress pushes biosimilar bills as interchangeability concerns linger
Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 02/09/2026
ANVISA updates understanding on biosimilar interchangeability
Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 22/07/2026
China's 12th VBP round accelerates shift to generics and biosimilars dual-track
Home/Policies & Legislation Posted 03/07/2026
The best selling biotechnology drugs of 2008: the next biosimilars targets
Post your comment