Biosimilars/General

FDA releases ‘Overview of Biosimilar Products’

As part of its ongoing mission to educate industry, the public and healthcare professionals about biosimilars, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has released an online educational course for healthcare professionals.

Celltrion to use cloud-based technology for its biosimilars trials

On 20 January 2016, Korea-based biopharmaceutical company Celltrion announced that it had adopted Medidata’s Clinical Cloud to provide scalable technology for its biosimilars development programmes. The technologies include electronic data capture and management (Medidata Rave), medical coding (Medidata Coder) and randomization and trial supply management (Medidata Balance).

Biologicals patent expiries

Biosimilars are now a reality. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved its first biosimilar back in 2006 [1] and, with the increasing price of new biologicals and continuing pressure on healthcare budgets, biosimilars are expected to make up an increasing share of the biologicals market.

Launch of partnership for biosimilars education and access

The Biosimilars Forum announced on 1 February 2016 the launch of a new biosimilars education initiative. The ‘Partnership for Biosimilars Education and Access’ will focus on raising awareness and encouraging access to biosimilars in the US.

Inflectra PBS listing expected to deliver savings in Australia

The infliximab biosimilar Inflectra was approved for listing in Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) on 1 December 2015. This is a decision that ‘will deliver immediate savings’ to the Australian Government, according to the Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association (GBMA), a group that represents generic and biosimilar medicine suppliers in Australia.

Outcry at new US biosimilars reimbursement policy

A newly announced US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) rule that gathers together all biosimilars of a single reference product under just one code has been widely criticized by drugmakers. Drugmakers warn that the rule on Medicare physician payment would reduce incentives for developing biosimilars, reduce patient access and create safety issues due to the inability to differentiate between biosimilars and reference products.

Biosimilar naming in the US, the debate continues

The United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) has called on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reconsider its draft guidance Nonproprietary Naming of Biological Products: Guidance for Industry.

Generics group established first voice for biosimilars in Canada

The Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association (CGPA), which represents Canada’s generics industry, announced on 7 April 2015 that it had set up a new CGPA Biosimilars Board, with Mr Michel Robidoux, President and General Manager of Sandoz Canada, as its inaugural Chair.

Australia’s DoH seeks feedback on biosimilars awareness project

Australia’s Department of Health (DoH) wants to improve awareness and confidence in biosimilars in the community and among healthcare professionals, including pharmacists and prescribers. To do this the DoH has developed an implementation framework, for which it is seeking feedback.

Call for compulsory license for biosimilar trastuzumab emtansine

A pressure group, which includes both patients and doctors, has called for the UK Government to overturn patents on Roche’s breast cancer treatment Kadcyla (trastuzumab emtansine).

European paediatricians advocate biosimilar trials in children with IBD

Paediatricians from Europe are concerned about the extrapolation of the limited amount of available clinical data from adults with rheumatologic diseases to children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [1].

Dutch medicines agency aims to clarify biosimilars confusion

The Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB) has further clarified its position on biosimilars since its last update in March 2015. The MEB had previously raised concerns among patient groups and professional organizations with the announcement that biosimilars had no relevant differences to originators.

Comments on FDA’s guidance on naming biologicals

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a draft guidance on the non-proprietary naming of biological products on 27 August 2015 [1], but not everyone is happy with the proposals made by the agency.

Australian approval for infliximab biosimilar

South Korean biotechnology company Celltrion announced on 10 August 2015 that its partner Hospira had gained approval from Australia’s drug regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), for the infliximab biosimilar Inflectra.

ACR position statement on biosimilars addresses naming and substitution

The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) has issued a position statement on biosimilars, reflecting its views on issues such as interchangeability, substitution, naming and post-marketing surveillance of biosimilars.

Polish firm gets EIB loan for biosimilars development

The European Investment Bank (EIB) is lending Euros 45 million (around Zloty 185 million) to the largest Polish manufacturer of pharmaceuticals, Polpharma, for its research into, and development of, biosimilars.

Concerns raised over Australian decision to substitute biosimilars

In May 2015, Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) recommended that originator biologicals could be substituted by biosimilars by physicians and pharmacists [1]. However, pharmacy companies, as well as physician and patient groups have reacted with concern over the decision.

Australia’s PBAC recommends substitution of biosimilars

Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) has recommended that biosimilars are suitable for substitution at the pharmacy level.

Biosimilar infliximab offered to French hospitals at 45% discount

A major French hospital group has chosen biosimilar infliximab to treat its patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease and psoriasis, after major discounts on the drug were offered to the group.

Spanish Society of Rheumatology issues position statement on biosimilars

The Spanish Society of Rheumatology (Sociedad Española de Reumatología, SER) has issued a position statement on biosimilars, reflecting its views on issues such as interchangeability and traceability of biosimilars.

GPhA launches Biosimilars Council

As part of ongoing efforts to educate and expand access to biosimilars, industry group, the US Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA), has launched its Biosimilars Council, a division of GPhA.

Biosimilars Forum launched

A group of biosimilars developers in the US announced on 5 May 2015 the launch of a joint initiative to promote biosimilars in the form of the Biosimilars Forum.

Australian guide to biosimilars

Australia’s Generic Medicines Industry Association (GMiA) has launched a Guide to Biosimilars. The guide is designed to provide a concise, ‘user-friendly’ reference on the subject for patients, clinicians, pharmacists, politicians and policymakers.

WHO receives positive feedback on BQ for biologicals

According to the World Health Organization’s executive summary of its 59th Consultation on International Nonproprietary Names (INNs) for Pharmaceutical Substances, almost half of comments on its proposed biological qualifier (BQ) for naming biologicals were positive.

Arguments for same INN for biosimilars presented at WHO meeting

The World Health Organization recently held its 60th Consultation on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances. At the meeting the issue of naming of biologicals, including biosimilars was once again discussed.

Dutch medicines agency says biosimilars ‘have no relevant differences’ to originators

The Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB) has updated its position on biosimilars, stating that ‘biosimilars have been proven to have no relevant differences compared to an innovator biological medicinal product as far as quality, safety and efficacy are concerned’.

Rheumatologists want to evaluate long-term safety of biosimilars

One of the biggest challenges for biosimilar companies is to convince physicians to use biosimilars instead of their well-known biological counterparts. One of the issues that physicians see as a concern is the long-term safety of biosimilars, a concern that is thought could slow down the adoption of biosimilars. This issue has even prompted certain organizations to embark on programmes that seek to provide definitive evidence on the issue.

Huge discount on biosimilar infliximab in Norway

Norway’s price regulator has been offered a discount of 72% for biosimilar infliximab in the country’s latest tender for drugs.

Norwegian study hopes to increase biosimilars uptake in Europe

Despite the fact that many countries within Europe are tightening its health budget, the uptake of lower-cost biosimilars is still relatively low in Europe.

EuropaBio calls for distinguishable names for biosimilars despite potential of big savings

On 6 November 2014, the European Association for Bioindustries (EuropaBio) published a new guide and a new position paper on biosimilars in Europe. EuropaBio expects these two documents to contribute to the policy debate on key issues regarding biosimilars among European and national regulators, policymakers, physicians, other healthcare providers, and patients.

More discussion over WHO biological qualifier

The World Health Organization recently held its 59th Consultation on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances. At the meeting the issue of naming of biologicals including biosimilars was once again discussed.

ABPI issues updated position paper on biosimilars

On 14 May 2014, the association that represents innovative research-based biopharmaceutical companies in the UK, the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), issued the third edition of its position paper on biosimilars.

IAPO releases toolkit for biologicals and biosimilars

The International Alliance of Patients’ Organizations (IAPO), which comprises over 200 patient groups and represents the interests of patients worldwide, has published an Information and Advocacy Toolkit on Biological and Biosimilar Medicines for Patients’ Organizations. The Toolkit, published in November 2013, provides up-to-date, evidence-based information on the science, technology and regulatory information relevant to biologicals and biosimilars.

Call for action on labelling of biosimilars

European trade association, the European Association for Bioindustry (EuropaBio) has called on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to define specific guidance on the labelling of biosimilars.

Biosimilars applications under review by EMA – August 2014

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the body responsible for approval of biosimilars within the European Union (EU). A legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003. Approval of biosimilars is based on an abbreviated registration process, which allows biosimilars manufacturers to provide a reduced package of information compared to originator drugs, provided they can prove ‘similarity’ to the originator or reference drug.

FDA debuts purple book for biologicals and interchangeable biosimilars

On 9 September 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the publication of its first-ever edition of the ‘Purple Book’, a new set of lists of licensed biological products and interchangeable biosimilars that is meant to be the biological equivalent of the ‘Orange Book’, which lists pharmaceuticals and their generic equivalents.

US senators call for guidance on biosimilars

A growing number of US senators are calling on the country’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to release guidance on key scientific policy questions related to biosimilars.

WHO investigates use of a biological qualifier for biosimilars

The World Health Organization is still discussing several different options on how to name biosimilars, according to the recently published executive summary of its 57th Consultation on International Nonproprietary Names (INNs) for Pharmaceutical Substances.

Physicians believe biosimilars should have different names

In the ongoing debate over how to name biosimilars, US physicians have now added their opinion to the discussion.

WHO proposal offers clarity for biosimilar nomenclature

Following requests from drug regulatory authorities worldwide, the World Health Organization (WHO) has released a draft Biological Qualifier (BQ) proposal on which to base a globally recognized naming scheme for biological products, including biosimilars. According to the proposal, a four-letter code – the BQ – would be added after the INN.

32 organizations agree biosimilars should have same names

On 1 July 2014, 32 organizations signed a letter calling on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to require biologicals and biosimilars to have the same International Nonproprietary Name (INN).

ECCO position statement on biosimilars

The European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) is a non-profit association with the aim of improving the care of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Europe. The association currently includes 2,519 individual experts, 33 country members and 17 corporate members.

Top 8 blockbuster biologicals 2013

The top three best-selling drugs during 2013 were biologicals. All three best-sellers are indicated for the treatment of arthritis, and include Abbott’s Humira (adalimumab), Merck’s Remicade (infliximab) and Roche’s Rituxan/MabThera (rituximab).

Biosimilars applications under review by EMA – April 2014

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the body responsible for approval of biosimilars within the European Union (EU). A legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003. Approval of biosimilars is based on an abbreviated registration process, which allows biosimilars manufacturers to provide a reduced package of information compared to originator drugs, provided they can prove ‘similarity’ to the originator or reference drug.

Biosimilars approved in New Zealand

Last update: 2 May 2014

In New Zealand, the regulatory body for the approval of medicines, including biosimilars, is the New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority (Medsafe).

Biosimilars knowledge gap needs addressing

The European Generic medicines Association (EGA) has called upon national authorities and medical societies to actively engage in reducing the knowledge gap about biosimilars.

Copaxone sees off generics challenge

Teva received a major boost in June 2012, after a US court backed the Israeli firm in a patent dispute concerning its multiple sclerosis blockbuster Copaxone (glatiramer acetate).

GPhA proposes using manufacturer names to distinguish biosimilars

The Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA) has proposed a compromise naming scheme for biosimilars that it hopes will end the dispute over how to assign international non-proprietary names (INNs) to biosimilars in the US.

EU majority says same INNs for biosimilars

According to recently published summary minutes from an October 2013 meeting of the European Commission’s Pharmaceutical Committee, the majority of EU Member States agree that biosimilars should have the same international non-proprietary name (INN) as their reference biological.

Biosimilars developments during 2013

Last update: 12 February 2014 

The past year has been a busy one for the biosimilars’ industry. One of the most important milestones during 2013 was the European approval of the first monoclonal antibody biosimilar infliximab [Remsima/Inflectra] made as a collaboration by South Korean biotechnology company Celltrion and US-based generics major Hospira [1]. Celltrion has also gained approval for Remsima in South Korea [2] and Colombia [3], and has also applied for approval in Japan [4]. In fact, in Europe, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has been busy during 2013 approving five biosimilars [5, 6].

Biosimilars applications under review by EMA – 2013 Q4

Last update: 17 January 2014

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the body responsible for approval of biosimilars within the European Union (EU). A legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003. Approval of biosimilars is based on an abbreviated registration process, which allows biosimilars manufacturers to provide a reduced package of information compared to originator drugs, provided they can prove ‘similarity’ to the originator or reference drug.

J&J adds its opinion to biosimilars naming debate

In the ongoing saga over how to name biosimilars healthcare giant Johnson & Johnson (J&J) has added its opinion to the melting pot; petitioning the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to give biosimilars similar, but not identical names, to those of the originator biological products.

Calls for biosimilars to have same INN at WHO meeting

Last update: 7 February 2014 

The World Health Organization (WHO) held its 57th Consultation on International Nonproprietary Names (INNs) for Pharmaceutical Substances on 22 October 2013 in Geneva, Switzerland. During the meeting some stakeholders called for biosimilars to be assigned the same INN as their reference biologicals, while others called for the use of distinct non-propriety names.

Biologicals sales quadruple from 2002 to 2017

Biologicals are outstripping regular pharmaceuticals in terms of growth and taking a bigger and bigger chunk of overall drug sales. Increasingly, biosimilars and non-originator biologicals are also taking a small share of this market.

Copaxone stay rejected and balugrastim withdrawn

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (Teva) had its request for a stay of an appeals court ruling on its blockbuster drug Copaxone (glatiramer acetate) rejected, and that it had withdrawn its application for approval of balugrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]).

Merck acquires follow-on Copaxone NBCD: determined to lead in MS

Germany-based Merck already markets its own multiple sclerosis (MS) drug Rebif (interferon beta-1a) but suffered a major blow during 2011 when regulators on both sides of the Atlantic rejected its oral MS treatment Movectro (cladribine). Merck has since abandoned the project.

Germany wants to increase biosimilars penetration

Germany may introduce regulations to increase the uptake of biosimilars in the country, according to Mr Mathias Heck, who serves as the European Union Legal and Policy Counsel with the European Office of the German Pharmaceutical Industry Association (Bundesverband der Pharmazeutischen Industrie, BPI).

Survey highlights the importance of unique names for biosimilars

A report released by the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) on 22 November 2013 highlights the importance of using unique names for identifying biosimilars.

Biosimilars naming debate intensifies

In October 2013, a letter was sent to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by a bipartisan group of US senators calling for biosimilars to have the same active ingredient name as the brand-name originator product [1]. This has prompted a response from ‘authors and champions’ of the biosimilars legislation.

Similar biotherapeutic products under development in Latin America

Last update: 15 November 2013

Similar biotherapeutic products are high on the health policy agenda in Latin America, due to the fact that they are less costly and therefore have the potential to increase access to life-saving drugs. Within individual Latin American countries, the regulatory processes and stages of implementation of similar biotherapeutic products regulation vary widely. Despite this, Latin America is moving towards increasing standards of regulation for these products [1, 2].

EGA commends EMA workshop on biosimilars guidelines

The European Generic medicines Association (EGA) has congratulated the European Medicines Agency (EMA) on its organization of the EMA workshop on biosimilars and urges rapid adoption of its revisions to the agency’s overarching guidelines on biosimilars.

FDA extends biosimilars deadlines due to US shutdown

As a result of the US government shutdown, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has extended the deadlines and goal dates for its biosimilars activities.

ASBM publishes paper on biosimilar naming

The US-based Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) announced on 28 November 2012 that its recommendations with respect to identification and substitution of biosimilars have been published in the Food and Drug Law Institute (FDLI) policy forum.

EGA’s vision for biosimilars and generics

On 8 October 2013, the European Generic medicines Association (EGA) launched its industrial policy vision for the future of the biosimilars and generics industries in Europe at the EGA Industrial Policy Conference.

Biosimilars applications under review by EMA – 2013 Q2

Last update: 15 October 2013 

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the body responsible for approval of biosimilars within the EU. A legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003. Approval of biosimilars is based on an abbreviated registration process, which allows biosimilars manufacturers to provide a reduced package of information compared to originator drugs, provided they can prove ‘similarity’ to the originator or reference drug.

Biosimilars applications under review by EMA – 2013 Q3

Last update: 4 October 2013

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the body responsible for approval of biosimilars within the EU. A legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003. Approval of biosimilars is based on an abbreviated registration process, which allows biosimilars manufacturers to provide a reduced package of information compared to originator drugs, provided they can prove ‘similarity’ to the originator or reference drug.

Fight continues over biosimilar naming standards

Biosimilar products marketed in the US should share the same common non-proprietary name as the reference brand-name biological medicine, according to the Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA).

Biosimilars applications under review by EMA – 2012 Q4

Last update: 23 August 2013 

European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the body responsible for approval of biosimilars within the EU. A legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003. Approval of biosimilars is based on an abbreviated registration process, which allows biosimilars manufacturers to provide a reduced package of information compared to originator drugs, provided they can prove ‘similarity’ to the originator or ‘reference drug’.

Call for clarity in FDA’s draft guidance on biosimilar meetings

Drug companies have made comments on FDA’s draft guidance for industry on formal meetings between the agency and biosimilars manufacturers. They believe that the guidance needs some revision to protect data and provide clarity.

Biologicals sales have almost doubled since 2006

Sales of biologicals have almost doubled from US$63.8 billion in 2006 to US$124.6 billion in 2012.

Biosimilars and US exclusivity

Currently, the legal pathway in the US for the approval of biosimilars is the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCI Act) of 2009.

Biosimilars applications under review by EMA – 2013 Q1

Last update: 12 April 2013 

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the body responsible for approval of biosimilars within the EU. A legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003. Approval of biosimilars is based on an abbreviated registration process, which allows biosimilars manufacturers to provide a reduced package of information compared to originator drugs, provided they can prove ‘similarity’ to the originator or ‘reference drug’.

Recall of anaemia drug highlights safety issues of NBCDs

US-based biotech firm Affymax announced on 24 February 2013 that it is recalling all lots of its red blood cell-stimulating medicine Omontys (peginesatide).  This could have broader implications on how FDA evaluates follow-on non-biological complex drugs (NBCDs).

Pharma companies sue EMA to block release of data

US-based biotech companies AbbVie and InterMune have both sued EMA in a bid to block publication of clinical trial data for their drugs.

US FDA defends biosimilar substitution

US FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg defended the substitution of interchangeable biosimilars at the Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA) Annual Meeting which was held in Orlando, Florida, USA, on 20–22 February 2013.

Biosimilars to replace 70% of chemical drugs

Biosimilars will replace some 70% of global chemical drugs over the next couple of decades, according to industry experts. This replacement will occur due to the better safety profiles of biosimilars compared to chemical drugs and the fact that many originator biologicals will lose their patent protection in the coming years, according to Mr Appaji, Director General of Pharmaceuticals Export Promotion Council of India (Pharmexcil).

Top developments in biosimilars during 2012

Much has happened in the biosimilars’ industry over the last year.

Originator biologicals approved and marketed in Germany

Last updated: 14 December 2012 

The Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, BfArM) is responsible for the approval, i.e. marketing authorization, of medicinal products, including biologicals, in Germany.

Competing biosimilars to Amgen’s biologicals

Amgen has been a leading biotechnology company since 1980. Amgen pioneered the development of novel products based on advances in recombinant DNA and molecular biology and launched the biotechnology industry’s first blockbuster medicines.

ABPI issues position paper on biosimilars

The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), which represents innovative research-based biopharmaceutical companies in the UK, announced on 12 November 2012 the publication of its position paper on biosimilars.