Biosimilars/General

Celltrion to use cloud-based technology for its biosimilars trials

On 20 January 2016, Korea-based biopharmaceutical company Celltrion announced that it had adopted Medidata’s Clinical Cloud to provide scalable technology for its biosimilars development programmes. The technologies include electronic data capture and management (Medidata Rave), medical coding (Medidata Coder) and randomization and trial supply management (Medidata Balance).

Biologicals patent expiries

Biosimilars are now a reality. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved its first biosimilar back in 2006 [1] and, with the increasing price of new biologicals and continuing pressure on healthcare budgets, biosimilars are expected to make up an increasing share of the biologicals market.

Launch of partnership for biosimilars education and access

The Biosimilars Forum announced on 1 February 2016 the launch of a new biosimilars education initiative. The ‘Partnership for Biosimilars Education and Access’ will focus on raising awareness and encouraging access to biosimilars in the US.

Inflectra PBS listing expected to deliver savings in Australia

The infliximab biosimilar Inflectra was approved for listing in Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) on 1 December 2015. This is a decision that ‘will deliver immediate savings’ to the Australian Government, according to the Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association (GBMA), a group that represents generic and biosimilar medicine suppliers in Australia.

Outcry at new US biosimilars reimbursement policy

A newly announced US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) rule that gathers together all biosimilars of a single reference product under just one code has been widely criticized by drugmakers. Drugmakers warn that the rule on Medicare physician payment would reduce incentives for developing biosimilars, reduce patient access and create safety issues due to the inability to differentiate between biosimilars and reference products.

Biosimilar naming in the US, the debate continues

The United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) has called on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reconsider its draft guidance Nonproprietary Naming of Biological Products: Guidance for Industry.

Generics group established first voice for biosimilars in Canada

The Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association (CGPA), which represents Canada’s generics industry, announced on 7 April 2015 that it had set up a new CGPA Biosimilars Board, with Mr Michel Robidoux, President and General Manager of Sandoz Canada, as its inaugural Chair.

Australia’s DoH seeks feedback on biosimilars awareness project

Australia’s Department of Health (DoH) wants to improve awareness and confidence in biosimilars in the community and among healthcare professionals, including pharmacists and prescribers. To do this the DoH has developed an implementation framework, for which it is seeking feedback.

Call for compulsory license for biosimilar trastuzumab emtansine

A pressure group, which includes both patients and doctors, has called for the UK Government to overturn patents on Roche’s breast cancer treatment Kadcyla (trastuzumab emtansine).

European paediatricians advocate biosimilar trials in children with IBD

Paediatricians from Europe are concerned about the extrapolation of the limited amount of available clinical data from adults with rheumatologic diseases to children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [1].

Dutch medicines agency aims to clarify biosimilars confusion

The Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB) has further clarified its position on biosimilars since its last update in March 2015. The MEB had previously raised concerns among patient groups and professional organizations with the announcement that biosimilars had no relevant differences to originators.

Comments on FDA’s guidance on naming biologicals

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a draft guidance on the non-proprietary naming of biological products on 27 August 2015 [1], but not everyone is happy with the proposals made by the agency.

Australian approval for infliximab biosimilar

South Korean biotechnology company Celltrion announced on 10 August 2015 that its partner Hospira had gained approval from Australia’s drug regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), for the infliximab biosimilar Inflectra.

ACR position statement on biosimilars addresses naming and substitution

The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) has issued a position statement on biosimilars, reflecting its views on issues such as interchangeability, substitution, naming and post-marketing surveillance of biosimilars.

Polish firm gets EIB loan for biosimilars development

The European Investment Bank (EIB) is lending Euros 45 million (around Zloty 185 million) to the largest Polish manufacturer of pharmaceuticals, Polpharma, for its research into, and development of, biosimilars.

Concerns raised over Australian decision to substitute biosimilars

In May 2015, Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) recommended that originator biologicals could be substituted by biosimilars by physicians and pharmacists [1]. However, pharmacy companies, as well as physician and patient groups have reacted with concern over the decision.

Australia’s PBAC recommends substitution of biosimilars

Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) has recommended that biosimilars are suitable for substitution at the pharmacy level.

Biosimilar infliximab offered to French hospitals at 45% discount

A major French hospital group has chosen biosimilar infliximab to treat its patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease and psoriasis, after major discounts on the drug were offered to the group.

Spanish Society of Rheumatology issues position statement on biosimilars

The Spanish Society of Rheumatology (Sociedad Española de Reumatología, SER) has issued a position statement on biosimilars, reflecting its views on issues such as interchangeability and traceability of biosimilars.

GPhA launches Biosimilars Council

As part of ongoing efforts to educate and expand access to biosimilars, industry group, the US Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA), has launched its Biosimilars Council, a division of GPhA.

Biosimilars Forum launched

A group of biosimilars developers in the US announced on 5 May 2015 the launch of a joint initiative to promote biosimilars in the form of the Biosimilars Forum.

Australian guide to biosimilars

Australia’s Generic Medicines Industry Association (GMiA) has launched a Guide to Biosimilars. The guide is designed to provide a concise, ‘user-friendly’ reference on the subject for patients, clinicians, pharmacists, politicians and policymakers.

WHO receives positive feedback on BQ for biologicals

According to the World Health Organization’s executive summary of its 59th Consultation on International Nonproprietary Names (INNs) for Pharmaceutical Substances, almost half of comments on its proposed biological qualifier (BQ) for naming biologicals were positive.

Arguments for same INN for biosimilars presented at WHO meeting

The World Health Organization recently held its 60th Consultation on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances. At the meeting the issue of naming of biologicals, including biosimilars was once again discussed.

Dutch medicines agency says biosimilars ‘have no relevant differences’ to originators

The Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB) has updated its position on biosimilars, stating that ‘biosimilars have been proven to have no relevant differences compared to an innovator biological medicinal product as far as quality, safety and efficacy are concerned’.

Rheumatologists want to evaluate long-term safety of biosimilars

One of the biggest challenges for biosimilar companies is to convince physicians to use biosimilars instead of their well-known biological counterparts. One of the issues that physicians see as a concern is the long-term safety of biosimilars, a concern that is thought could slow down the adoption of biosimilars. This issue has even prompted certain organizations to embark on programmes that seek to provide definitive evidence on the issue.

Huge discount on biosimilar infliximab in Norway

Norway’s price regulator has been offered a discount of 72% for biosimilar infliximab in the country’s latest tender for drugs.

Norwegian study hopes to increase biosimilars uptake in Europe

Despite the fact that many countries within Europe are tightening its health budget, the uptake of lower-cost biosimilars is still relatively low in Europe.

EuropaBio calls for distinguishable names for biosimilars despite potential of big savings

On 6 November 2014, the European Association for Bioindustries (EuropaBio) published a new guide and a new position paper on biosimilars in Europe. EuropaBio expects these two documents to contribute to the policy debate on key issues regarding biosimilars among European and national regulators, policymakers, physicians, other healthcare providers, and patients.

More discussion over WHO biological qualifier

The World Health Organization recently held its 59th Consultation on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances. At the meeting the issue of naming of biologicals including biosimilars was once again discussed.

ABPI issues updated position paper on biosimilars

On 14 May 2014, the association that represents innovative research-based biopharmaceutical companies in the UK, the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), issued the third edition of its position paper on biosimilars.

IAPO releases toolkit for biologicals and biosimilars

The International Alliance of Patients’ Organizations (IAPO), which comprises over 200 patient groups and represents the interests of patients worldwide, has published an Information and Advocacy Toolkit on Biological and Biosimilar Medicines for Patients’ Organizations. The Toolkit, published in November 2013, provides up-to-date, evidence-based information on the science, technology and regulatory information relevant to biologicals and biosimilars.

Call for action on labelling of biosimilars

European trade association, the European Association for Bioindustry (EuropaBio) has called on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to define specific guidance on the labelling of biosimilars.

Biosimilars applications under review by EMA – August 2014

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the body responsible for approval of biosimilars within the European Union (EU). A legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003. Approval of biosimilars is based on an abbreviated registration process, which allows biosimilars manufacturers to provide a reduced package of information compared to originator drugs, provided they can prove ‘similarity’ to the originator or reference drug.

FDA debuts purple book for biologicals and interchangeable biosimilars

On 9 September 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the publication of its first-ever edition of the ‘Purple Book’, a new set of lists of licensed biological products and interchangeable biosimilars that is meant to be the biological equivalent of the ‘Orange Book’, which lists pharmaceuticals and their generic equivalents.

US senators call for guidance on biosimilars

A growing number of US senators are calling on the country’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to release guidance on key scientific policy questions related to biosimilars.

WHO investigates use of a biological qualifier for biosimilars

The World Health Organization is still discussing several different options on how to name biosimilars, according to the recently published executive summary of its 57th Consultation on International Nonproprietary Names (INNs) for Pharmaceutical Substances.

Physicians believe biosimilars should have different names

In the ongoing debate over how to name biosimilars, US physicians have now added their opinion to the discussion.

WHO proposal offers clarity for biosimilar nomenclature

Following requests from drug regulatory authorities worldwide, the World Health Organization (WHO) has released a draft Biological Qualifier (BQ) proposal on which to base a globally recognized naming scheme for biological products, including biosimilars. According to the proposal, a four-letter code – the BQ – would be added after the INN.

32 organizations agree biosimilars should have same names

On 1 July 2014, 32 organizations signed a letter calling on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to require biologicals and biosimilars to have the same International Nonproprietary Name (INN).

ECCO position statement on biosimilars

The European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) is a non-profit association with the aim of improving the care of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Europe. The association currently includes 2,519 individual experts, 33 country members and 17 corporate members.

Top 8 blockbuster biologicals 2013

The top three best-selling drugs during 2013 were biologicals. All three best-sellers are indicated for the treatment of arthritis, and include Abbott’s Humira (adalimumab), Merck’s Remicade (infliximab) and Roche’s Rituxan/MabThera (rituximab).

Biosimilars applications under review by EMA – April 2014

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the body responsible for approval of biosimilars within the European Union (EU). A legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003. Approval of biosimilars is based on an abbreviated registration process, which allows biosimilars manufacturers to provide a reduced package of information compared to originator drugs, provided they can prove ‘similarity’ to the originator or reference drug.

Biosimilars approved in New Zealand

Last update: 2 May 2014

In New Zealand, the regulatory body for the approval of medicines, including biosimilars, is the New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority (Medsafe).

Biosimilars knowledge gap needs addressing

The European Generic medicines Association (EGA) has called upon national authorities and medical societies to actively engage in reducing the knowledge gap about biosimilars.

Copaxone sees off generics challenge

Teva received a major boost in June 2012, after a US court backed the Israeli firm in a patent dispute concerning its multiple sclerosis blockbuster Copaxone (glatiramer acetate).

GPhA proposes using manufacturer names to distinguish biosimilars

The Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA) has proposed a compromise naming scheme for biosimilars that it hopes will end the dispute over how to assign international non-proprietary names (INNs) to biosimilars in the US.

EU majority says same INNs for biosimilars

According to recently published summary minutes from an October 2013 meeting of the European Commission’s Pharmaceutical Committee, the majority of EU Member States agree that biosimilars should have the same international non-proprietary name (INN) as their reference biological.

Biosimilars developments during 2013

Last update: 12 February 2014 

The past year has been a busy one for the biosimilars’ industry. One of the most important milestones during 2013 was the European approval of the first monoclonal antibody biosimilar infliximab [Remsima/Inflectra] made as a collaboration by South Korean biotechnology company Celltrion and US-based generics major Hospira [1]. Celltrion has also gained approval for Remsima in South Korea [2] and Colombia [3], and has also applied for approval in Japan [4]. In fact, in Europe, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has been busy during 2013 approving five biosimilars [5, 6].

Biosimilars applications under review by EMA – 2013 Q4

Last update: 17 January 2014

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the body responsible for approval of biosimilars within the European Union (EU). A legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003. Approval of biosimilars is based on an abbreviated registration process, which allows biosimilars manufacturers to provide a reduced package of information compared to originator drugs, provided they can prove ‘similarity’ to the originator or reference drug.

J&J adds its opinion to biosimilars naming debate

In the ongoing saga over how to name biosimilars healthcare giant Johnson & Johnson (J&J) has added its opinion to the melting pot; petitioning the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to give biosimilars similar, but not identical names, to those of the originator biological products.

Calls for biosimilars to have same INN at WHO meeting

Last update: 7 February 2014 

The World Health Organization (WHO) held its 57th Consultation on International Nonproprietary Names (INNs) for Pharmaceutical Substances on 22 October 2013 in Geneva, Switzerland. During the meeting some stakeholders called for biosimilars to be assigned the same INN as their reference biologicals, while others called for the use of distinct non-propriety names.

Biologicals sales quadruple from 2002 to 2017

Biologicals are outstripping regular pharmaceuticals in terms of growth and taking a bigger and bigger chunk of overall drug sales. Increasingly, biosimilars and non-originator biologicals are also taking a small share of this market.

Copaxone stay rejected and balugrastim withdrawn

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (Teva) had its request for a stay of an appeals court ruling on its blockbuster drug Copaxone (glatiramer acetate) rejected, and that it had withdrawn its application for approval of balugrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]).

Merck acquires follow-on Copaxone NBCD: determined to lead in MS

Germany-based Merck already markets its own multiple sclerosis (MS) drug Rebif (interferon beta-1a) but suffered a major blow during 2011 when regulators on both sides of the Atlantic rejected its oral MS treatment Movectro (cladribine). Merck has since abandoned the project.

Germany wants to increase biosimilars penetration

Germany may introduce regulations to increase the uptake of biosimilars in the country, according to Mr Mathias Heck, who serves as the European Union Legal and Policy Counsel with the European Office of the German Pharmaceutical Industry Association (Bundesverband der Pharmazeutischen Industrie, BPI).

Survey highlights the importance of unique names for biosimilars

A report released by the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) on 22 November 2013 highlights the importance of using unique names for identifying biosimilars.

Biosimilars naming debate intensifies

In October 2013, a letter was sent to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by a bipartisan group of US senators calling for biosimilars to have the same active ingredient name as the brand-name originator product [1]. This has prompted a response from ‘authors and champions’ of the biosimilars legislation.

Similar biotherapeutic products under development in Latin America

Last update: 15 November 2013

Similar biotherapeutic products are high on the health policy agenda in Latin America, due to the fact that they are less costly and therefore have the potential to increase access to life-saving drugs. Within individual Latin American countries, the regulatory processes and stages of implementation of similar biotherapeutic products regulation vary widely. Despite this, Latin America is moving towards increasing standards of regulation for these products [1, 2].

EGA commends EMA workshop on biosimilars guidelines

The European Generic medicines Association (EGA) has congratulated the European Medicines Agency (EMA) on its organization of the EMA workshop on biosimilars and urges rapid adoption of its revisions to the agency’s overarching guidelines on biosimilars.

FDA extends biosimilars deadlines due to US shutdown

As a result of the US government shutdown, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has extended the deadlines and goal dates for its biosimilars activities.

ASBM publishes paper on biosimilar naming

The US-based Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) announced on 28 November 2012 that its recommendations with respect to identification and substitution of biosimilars have been published in the Food and Drug Law Institute (FDLI) policy forum.

EGA’s vision for biosimilars and generics

On 8 October 2013, the European Generic medicines Association (EGA) launched its industrial policy vision for the future of the biosimilars and generics industries in Europe at the EGA Industrial Policy Conference.

Biosimilars applications under review by EMA – 2013 Q2

Last update: 15 October 2013 

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the body responsible for approval of biosimilars within the EU. A legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003. Approval of biosimilars is based on an abbreviated registration process, which allows biosimilars manufacturers to provide a reduced package of information compared to originator drugs, provided they can prove ‘similarity’ to the originator or reference drug.

Biosimilars applications under review by EMA – 2013 Q3

Last update: 4 October 2013

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the body responsible for approval of biosimilars within the EU. A legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003. Approval of biosimilars is based on an abbreviated registration process, which allows biosimilars manufacturers to provide a reduced package of information compared to originator drugs, provided they can prove ‘similarity’ to the originator or reference drug.

Fight continues over biosimilar naming standards

Biosimilar products marketed in the US should share the same common non-proprietary name as the reference brand-name biological medicine, according to the Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA).

Biosimilars applications under review by EMA – 2012 Q4

Last update: 23 August 2013 

European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the body responsible for approval of biosimilars within the EU. A legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003. Approval of biosimilars is based on an abbreviated registration process, which allows biosimilars manufacturers to provide a reduced package of information compared to originator drugs, provided they can prove ‘similarity’ to the originator or ‘reference drug’.

Call for clarity in FDA’s draft guidance on biosimilar meetings

Drug companies have made comments on FDA’s draft guidance for industry on formal meetings between the agency and biosimilars manufacturers. They believe that the guidance needs some revision to protect data and provide clarity.

Biologicals sales have almost doubled since 2006

Sales of biologicals have almost doubled from US$63.8 billion in 2006 to US$124.6 billion in 2012.

Biosimilars and US exclusivity

Currently, the legal pathway in the US for the approval of biosimilars is the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCI Act) of 2009.

Biosimilars applications under review by EMA – 2013 Q1

Last update: 12 April 2013 

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the body responsible for approval of biosimilars within the EU. A legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003. Approval of biosimilars is based on an abbreviated registration process, which allows biosimilars manufacturers to provide a reduced package of information compared to originator drugs, provided they can prove ‘similarity’ to the originator or ‘reference drug’.

Recall of anaemia drug highlights safety issues of NBCDs

US-based biotech firm Affymax announced on 24 February 2013 that it is recalling all lots of its red blood cell-stimulating medicine Omontys (peginesatide).  This could have broader implications on how FDA evaluates follow-on non-biological complex drugs (NBCDs).

Pharma companies sue EMA to block release of data

US-based biotech companies AbbVie and InterMune have both sued EMA in a bid to block publication of clinical trial data for their drugs.

US FDA defends biosimilar substitution

US FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg defended the substitution of interchangeable biosimilars at the Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA) Annual Meeting which was held in Orlando, Florida, USA, on 20–22 February 2013.

Biosimilars to replace 70% of chemical drugs

Biosimilars will replace some 70% of global chemical drugs over the next couple of decades, according to industry experts. This replacement will occur due to the better safety profiles of biosimilars compared to chemical drugs and the fact that many originator biologicals will lose their patent protection in the coming years, according to Mr Appaji, Director General of Pharmaceuticals Export Promotion Council of India (Pharmexcil).

Top developments in biosimilars during 2012

Much has happened in the biosimilars’ industry over the last year.

Originator biologicals approved and marketed in Germany

Last updated: 14 December 2012 

The Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, BfArM) is responsible for the approval, i.e. marketing authorization, of medicinal products, including biologicals, in Germany.

Competing biosimilars to Amgen’s biologicals

Amgen has been a leading biotechnology company since 1980. Amgen pioneered the development of novel products based on advances in recombinant DNA and molecular biology and launched the biotechnology industry’s first blockbuster medicines.

ABPI issues position paper on biosimilars

The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), which represents innovative research-based biopharmaceutical companies in the UK, announced on 12 November 2012 the publication of its position paper on biosimilars.

Biosimilars approved and marketed in Germany

Last updated: 23 November 2012 

The Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, BfArM) is responsible for the approval, i.e. marketing authorization, of medicinal products, including biosimilars, in Germany.

American dermatologists update position statement on biosimilar substitution

On 3 November 2012, the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) updated its position statement on generics and biosimilar substitution to reflect its views, in particular on interchangeability* and naming of biosimilars.

EMA definitions of generics and biosimilars

Confusion surrounding terms used in the global field of generics and biosimilars is a recognised problem. The members of the Biosimilar Medicinal Products Working Party at EMA have recently expressed the need to propose a more precise definition for biosimilars due to problems arising from imprecise usage of the term in the scientific literature and elsewhere [1].

Biosimilars applications under review by EMA

Last update:  11 January 2013 

EMA is the body responsible for approval of biosimilars within the EU. A legal framework for approving biosimilars was established in 2003.  Approval of biosimilars is based on an abbreviated registration process, which allows biosimilars manufacturers to provide a reduced package of information compared to originator drugs, provided they can prove ‘similarity’ to the originator or ‘reference drug’.

Teva asks FDA to delay approval of Biogen’s MS drug

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (Teva) has petitioned FDA not to approve Biogen Idec’s (Biogen’s) investigational pill for treatment of multiple sclerosis, BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate), citing safety concerns.

EMA publishes revised biosimilar Q&A document for patients

On 27 September 2012 EMA published its revised Questions and Answers (Q&A) document on biosimilar medicines aimed at patients and the general public.

Naming and interchangeability of biosimilars raised in new survey

The contentious issues of naming and interchangeability of biosimilars in the US have been raised once again, as a result of a survey carried out by the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM). The survey, released on 13 September 2012, examined physician practices and perspectives with regard to identification and substitution of biosimilars. These remain issues that are as yet unresolved by FDA.

Also noted on biosimilars: 30 March 2012

Bioequivalence of biosimilar trastuzumab to Herceptin proven in phase I trial
Biopharmaceutical company Synthon announced on 22 March 2012 that all in vitro and in vivo studies conducted so far have shown the biosimilar behaviour of Synthon’s trastuzumab in comparison with the reference product, Herceptin. The outcome of the phase I clinical trial confirmed these results, showing bioequivalence of Synthon’s trastuzumab to Herceptin. Synthon confirmed that its biosimilar trastuzumab will now enter a confirmatory phase III clinical trial in breast cancer patients.

Source: Synthon

FDA urged to exclude plasma protein therapies from biosimilar pathway

FDA is being lobbied by patient and industry groups to exclude plasma protein therapies from its pathway for the approval of biosimilars. FDA has a mandate to create a new abbreviated process for the approval of biosimilars under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, which was part of the new healthcare reform law passed in March 2010 [1]. This potentially brings cheaper products to market sooner, and so increases the availability of affordable health care. However, it also means that manufacturers applying for approval for new biosimilars may be able to skip clinical testing if they can demonstrate sufficient similarity with reference products.

US supreme court ruling means biosimilars pathway safe

On 28 June 2012 the US Supreme Court ruled in favour of the bulk of the Affordable Care Act, meaning that the biosimilars pathway, which is part of the act, is now also safe.

US Supreme Court looks set to challenge Affordable Care Act

The United States Supreme Court is reviewing the constitutionality of the provision in the Affordable Care Act providing that individuals should take personal responsibility for paying for their health care by obtaining health insurance or pay a fine. The move could mean that the Supreme Court rejects the whole healthcare law, including the biosimilars pathway created by the healthcare reform.

Biosimilars approved and marketed in The Netherlands

Last updated: 1 June 2012

The Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB) – College ter Beoordeling van Geneesmiddelen (CBG) – is responsible for the approval of marketing authorisation of medicinal products including biosimilars in The Netherlands.

FDA’s public hearing on biosimilars draft guidances

On 11 May 2012, FDA held a public hearing to gain input on their draft guidances relating to the development of biosimilar products and it seems that the guidances were generally well accepted.

Biosimilars approved and marketed in Belgium

Last updated: 18 May 2012 

The Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (FAMHP), formerly the Directorate-General for Medicinal Products of the Federal Public Service (FPS) Public Health, created in January 2007, is the official authority for medicines and health products in Belgium and is also responsible for authorising biosimilars in Belgium [1]. This is carried out via the EU procedures (centralised, national, mutual recognition or decentralised) and following EMA guidelines for biosimilars.

Also noted on biosimilars: 11 May 2012

Sandoz testimony at FDA hearing on biosimilars will emphasise need for consistent regulatory standards across all biologicals
Sandoz announced on 9 May 2012 that Dr Mark McCamish, Head of Global Biopharmaceutical Development, would present on behalf of the Novartis Group of companies (Novartis) at the 11 May 2012 FDA public hearing on draft guidances for biosimilars.

The message he will convey will focus on the need for a single science-based regulatory standard that FDA should apply across all biologicals, irrespective of the business model of the sponsor. As well as a single standard, Dr McCamish will address the points that biosimilar clinical studies should be only confirmatory and the fact that interchangeability is critical to maximising access to affordable biosimilars for US patients.

Source: Sandoz

Also noted on biosimilars: 13 April 2012

Palivizumab biosimilar successfully produced in plants
Biotechnology company iBio, self-professed leader in the plant-made pharmaceutical field, announced on 10 April 2012 that it had successfully used its iBioLaunch technology to produce biosimilar palivizumab in non-transgenic green plants.

This is the second monoclonal antibody that the company has successfully produced. Back in October 2011 the company announced the successful use of its technology to produce rituximab.

Related article

Rituximab biosimilar successfully produced in plants

Source: iBio

Also noted on biosimilars: 6 April 2012

Amgen and AstraZeneca make monoclonal antibody deal
Biotech giant Amgen and pharma major AstraZeneca announced on 2 April 2012 an agreement to jointly develop and commercialise five monoclonal antibodies from Amgen’s clinical inflammation portfolio (AMG 139, AMG 157, AMG 181, AMG 557 and brodalumab [AMG 827]), which are expected to be used to treat inflammatory diseases.

As part of the deal AstraZeneca will make an upfront payment of US$50 million and the companies will then share both costs and profits. The collaboration will provide Amgen with additional resources to optimally progress its portfolio and Amgen will benefit from the strong respiratory, inflammation and asthma development expertise of MedImmune–AstraZeneca’s biologicals arm.

Related articles

Amgen finally jumps on biosimilars bandwagon

AstraZeneca expands its generics business with Indian agreements

Source: Amgen, AstraZeneca

BIO and GPhA support biosimilar and generic user fees

Both the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) and the Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA) have expressed their support of user fees for biosimilars and generics.

Biosimilars will not be able to use ANDA pathway to approval

FDA’s highly anticipated guidance for biosimilars finally arrived on 10 February 2012 with the release of three draft guidance documents [1]. Some have complained that the guidance is too vague, however, FDA’s denial of three citizen’s petitions have perhaps made some issues clearer.

FDA announces public hearing on biosimilars’ guidelines

FDA has announced a one-day public hearing to be held on 11 May 2012, in Silver Spring, Maryland, USA. During the meeting FDA hopes ‘to obtain input on recently issued draft guidelines relating to the development of biosimilar products.’

Also noted on biosimilars: 16 March 2012

Boehringer Ingelheim expands biologicals manufacturing capacity
Boehringer Ingelheim announced on 29 February 2012 the expansion of its biopharmaceutical development and manufacturing capabilities at its cell culture and microbial sites in Biberach, Germany and Vienna, Austria. The company has invested around Euros 17 million in order to improve good manufacturing practice and to expand cell banking, process science, cell line development and quality laboratories.

Source: Boehringer Ingelheim

WHO definitions of biosimilars

Confusion often surrounds terms used in the global field of generics and biosimilars [1].

Biosimilars interchangeability, increased costs and burden for FDA

Biosimilars manufacturers in the US are faced with many hurdles, including untested regulatory pathways, patent challenges and manufacturing issues associated with making such complicated molecules. On top of this drugmakers also need to take into account the higher marketing costs that may be associated with biosimilars.

Quality by design in biomanufacturing

In January 2011, FDA published its long-awaited guidance for industry on Process Validation: General Principles and Practices [1].This replaces the previous 1987 version (updated 2004) and it is understandably a big change for some whose whole career has been dominated by the previous approach. The question is: why was a change needed and how drastic is it?

Top developments in biosimilars during 2011

Over the past year, a lot has happened in the biosimilars industry.

FDA biosimilar user fees meeting

FDA announced a public meeting to be held on 16 December 2011 to discuss its recommendations for the agency’s biosimilars user fee programme for 2013–17.

Health Canada definitions of generics and biosimilars

Attention has been brought to the fact that there is confusion surrounding terms used in the global field of generics and biosimilars. Some of this confusion has been attributed to authorities in various regions of the world defining terms differently and other instances are due to a misunderstanding of the actual nature, characteristics, and method of research and manufacture of these biological products.

Speed to market critical in biosimilar development

For companies looking to develop biosimilars speed to market is critical, but this must not be done by sacrificing product quality, according to a report from Contract Research Organisation (CRO) Quintiles. The most successful biosimilar companies will be those who collapse their clinical, commercial, and regulatory thinking into a streamlined cohesive function in order to expedite commercialisation and optimise market access.

FDA definitions of generics and biosimilars

Confusion surrounding terms used in the global field of generics and biosimilars is a recognised problem.

The source of some of this confusion is due to authorities in various regions of the world defining terms differently and other instances are due to a misunderstanding of the actual nature, characteristics, and method of research and manufacture of these biological products.

Biobetter of trastuzumab on the horizon

TrasGEX, which is currently under development by German biopharma company Glycotope, is shaping up to be an improved version (or biobetter) of Roche’s blockbuster cancer drug Herceptin (trastuzumab). Trastuzumab targets the HER2 receptor, commonly overexpressed in a variety of cancers, such as HER2-positive breast and stomach cancer.

Five years of bioequivalence data from Cetero questioned

FDA is challenging five years of bioequivalence and other studies conducted at Cetero Research’s Houston facility in the US. This could affect both originator and generics companies alike, putting into question data provided to FDA to support new drug applications (NDAs) and abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs).

Biotech growth and biosimilar opportunities in India

The domestic biotechnology industry in India has seen rapid growth during 2010 and India is poised to attain a position of leadership in the biosimilars market according to reports from Ernst & Young India and Frost and Sullivan.

FDA and biosimilars: update on key themes

Since the existence of a legal pathway for biosimilars was made possible by the signing of the 2009 Biologics Price Competition and Innovation (BPCI) Act in 2010 by President Barack Obama, FDA has declared itself ‘open for business’ for biosimilars [1]. But what is the thinking of FDA and what should we expect from any guidance on biosimilars?

FDA and biosimilars: process update

Despite the fact that a legal pathway for the approval of biosimilars in the US has existed for more than a year, formal guidance has still not been issued by FDA. This has led many to question when, or even if, biosimilars will come onto the market in the US [1]. So what has FDA been doing in the meantime and how close are we to seeing some biosimilar guidance in the US?

Current status of biosimilar development

Widespread therapeutic use of biological pharmaceutical products appears to be inevitable. Nevertheless, the law governing approval of biosimilar products in the US is still not in place. The size of the biologicals market and impending patent expiries, however, are making approval of a practical pathway for biosimilars more urgent.

Market opportunities for biosimilars

Although growth in annual spending on medicines is set to reduce, there is still a huge market out there and spending on biosimilars is expected to increase in the coming years.

Enoxaparin biosimilar or not

A biosimilar of the low molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin, produced by Sandoz (Novartis’s generics division) was approved by the FDA on 23 July 2010. However, some question whether this was really a biosimilar or not.

Biobetters rather than biosimilars

‘Biobetters’, rather than biosimilars, are the next big opportunity for biopharm and contract research organisations (CROs) hoping to profit from patent expirations on biologicals, say experts.

The history of the US biosimilar regulatory pathway

The US, although it now has a legal pathway (with the approval of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act [BPCI Act], which was signed into law on 23 March 2010 by President Barack Obama), does not yet have a practical pathway with guidance defined by the FDA.

More debate over the exclusivity period for biological in the US

The debate over the length of exclusivity that biological drugs can enjoy before competition from biosimilars ensues seems set to be a long and complicated one. The latest group to join in the debate is the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR).

Questions over US biosimilars pathway in light of Teva’s BLA

Questions have arisen over whether the abbreviated pathway for approval of biosimilars in the US will ever be used. Many believe that biosimilars manufacturers will opt out of this pathway and use the normal route via a Biologic License Application (BLA). This is backed up by the fact that Teva’s biosimilar, Neutroval, was submitted to the FDA via the normal BLA route.

Global biosimilar market to grow to US$3.7 billion in 2015

According to a report by Datamonitor published on 23 February 2011 the global biosimilars market will grow from US$243 million in 2010 to US$3.7 billion in 2015.

Are biosimilars an easy option for big money

With the recent JP Morgan 29th Annual Healthcare Conference 2011 in San Francisco, US came a chance for reporters to quiz all the big name firms in one easy sweep. The result reported by Reuters is that the pharma industry is poised to dive into biosimilars.

US Senate healthcare bill preserves biologicals exclusivity, but charges annual drugmaker fees

The recently released US Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, H.R. 3590, will ensure that all Americans have access to quality, affordable health care and will create the transformation within the healthcare system necessary to contain costs.

The hurdles to biosimilars in Europe

The stage is set for the entrance of biosimilars into the healthcare market. Patents are near expiry on the first biopharmaceuticals and the global biosimilars market is predicted to be worth more than Euros 1.5 billion by 2015. However, development costs will be high, unlike with generic drugs, the time taken to develop biosimilars is long, and acceptance on the market is not guaranteed.

Hurdles to entering the biosimilars’ market

Yet more hurdles to entering the biosimilars’ market have been identified in a Reuters’ report. High development costs, complex manufacturing and legal hurdles are holding back generic drugmakers seeking to copy high cost biotech medications nearing the end of their patents.

Biosimilars’ hurdles in the US

Europe serves as a model for other countries looking to define their own regulatory approval criteria. However the opposing interests of biosimilar and innovative companies is resulting in delays to the development of biosimilars in the US.

Hurdles to biosimilars in Asia

Now that a clear regulatory pathway for marketing biosimilars has been established in Europe, will Asian companies enter the global biosimilars race? Asian manufacturers face the same obstacles as western-based drugs companies, but local factors add a further twist to the tale.

Highs and lows for biosimilars during 2009/2010

A lot has happened in the biosimilars’ industry during 2009/2010.

Is US Congress poised to hinder biosimilars market entry?

A proposal by US Democratic Representative Anna Eshoo included in the US House health reform bill, would give developers of innovative biomedical drugs 12 years of data exclusivity from generic competition, significantly extending their patent rights, writes Los Angeles Times columnist Michael Hiltzik. Ms Eshoo said her proposal would give original makers of biotech drugs adequate profit to discover new treatments without discouraging generic drugmakers from working on follow-on biologics.

Innovation over imitation: New FOBs technologies, players

In an article by Xencor President and CEO Bassil Dahiyat, published in Pharmaceutical Executive on 4 November 2009, tables are presented on new technologies for creating ‘biobetter’ follow-on biologics (FOBs) and potential ‘Big Pharma’ players in FOBs.

Innovation over imitation - How to deliver FOBs on the bottom line

In an article by Xencor President and CEO Bassil Dahiyat, published in Pharmaceutical Executive on 4 November 2009, the development of ‘biobetter’ follow-on biologics (FOBs) — optimised versions of pioneer drugs that have improved pharmaceutical properties but carry only minor changes in structure — is discussed.

Innovation over imitation - Charting the FOBs landscape

In an article by Xencor President and CEO Bassil Dahiyat, published in Pharmaceutical Executive on 4 November 2009, the development of ‘biobetter’ follow-on biologics (FOBs) — optimised versions of pioneer drugs that have improved pharmaceutical properties but carry only minor changes in structure — is discussed.

Innovation over imitation: Tools to compete and win with ‘biobetter’ FOBs

In an article by Xencor President and CEO Bassil Dahiyat, published in Pharmaceutical Executive on 4 November 2009, the development of ‘biobetter’ follow-on biologics (FOBs) — optimised versions of pioneer drugs that have improved pharmaceutical properties but carry only minor changes in structure — is discussed.

Innovation over imitation: High-cost biosimilar FOB development, slow uptake

In an article by Xencor President and CEO Bassil Dahiyat, published in Pharmaceutical Executive on 4 November 2009, the development of ‘biobetter’ follow-on biologics (FOBs) — optimised versions of pioneer drugs that have improved pharmaceutical properties but carry only minor changes in structure — is discussed.

Innovation over imitation: ‘Biobetter’ follow-on biologics

In an article by Xencor President and CEO Bassil Dahiyat, published in Pharmaceutical Executive on 4 November 2009, the development of ‘biobetter’ follow-on biologics (FOBs) — optimised versions of pioneer drugs that have improved pharmaceutical properties but carry only minor changes in structure — is discussed.

Bionomics of biosimilars – India’s next big cash cow?

As reported by Ms Nayantara Som in BioSpectrumIndia of 13 January 2010, biosimilars are said to be the next big cash cow for India. According to her, however, players have many knots to untangle before they can have a firm grip over the economics of the market.

Bionomics of biosimilars – Indian opportunities

As reported by Ms Nayantara Som in BioSpectrumIndia of 13 January 2010, biosimilars are said to be the next big cash cow for India. However, players have many knots to untangle before they can have a firm grip over the economics of the market.

Bionomics of biosimilars – EU and US markets not easy for India

As reported by Ms Nayantara Som in BioSpectrumIndia of 13 January 2010, biosimilars are said to be the next big cash cow for India. However, players have many knots to untangle before they can have a firm grip over the economics of the market, she warns.

Bionomics of biosimilars - Indian options for investors

As reported by Ms Nayantara Som in BioSpectrumIndia of 13 January 2010, biosimilars are said to be the next big cash cow for India. However, players have many knots to untangle before they can have a firm grip over the economics of the market.

Global Industry Analysts: Global biosimilars market to exceed US$2 billion by 2015

On 24 March 2010, Global Industry Analysts (GIA) announced the release of a new report, entitled ‘Biosimilars: A Global Strategic Business Report’

Biosimilars mean competition for biologic brands

The historic passage of two US healthcare reform bills on 21 March 2010, including a US Senate bill with an approval pathway for biosimilars, means biologic brands could see rivals replicate and market similar products, writes Mr Marc Iskowitz in Medical Marketing & Media. According to him, the new legislation, signed by US president Mr Barack Obama on 23 March 2010, lays out a series of requirements for the FDA to consider follow-on biologics (FOBs) applications.

12 years exclusivity workable for patients; not anticompetitive

On IPWatchdog.com Gene Quinn distinguishes facts from fiction about biosimilars.

Will there be unfair delays for the entry of biosimilars?

As pointed out by Managing Editor, Ms Maria Fabiana Jorge, in the Editorial of the Journal of Generic Medicines, Volume 6, Issue 4 of August 2009, countries around the world define the future pharmaceutical market, we must learn from the past to avoid making the same mistakes or falling into new ones. Unfortunately, the current system has serious flaws and it seems that we are moving towards creating others in the new one. It is essential that governments, the pharmaceutical industry and civil society throughout the world work closely to strike a better balance between innovation and access in the context of biotechnology medicines.